CO129-396 - Public Offices - 1912 — Page 227

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All

nollect་་་

SIEI,81 xscetoo to el .on elasbrot niet vid ni stuemlonä

704 xol sjsje to yistered of JJOWAIT .4 1IG

225

Sielst recoJ50

ASS

.8 TisliA

-:11a

-00 00 ,JĘÌ9097 gift sgba(womos of Tonon sit sven I

,NJAI ISɗoż Tojjel un OJ €

29cmejysë atei bejeo,vigs1 8 to

Javywa n‡e betsb a'xeja ini... s'yJesleki eiH to Josidue saj ne ee spino saj 03 Isa ivba I8291 28 319m‡nioqqs ym of no liaoq qo

İSMAISVOD of cisc asw Ji sgeuguel Isisilto lo yaori mis yƐ

antri of Ilenou eat svan I. "Issa gniɣli Tebow" smoo evan -qs 9VjJS13obi bas Jaetzo qui ne or anisefer Tej Jam & ni Jalij ncidonijaio To adeoq beiquooo esa odw nemsijnss s jneudnioq

bas no ijsistianco #Tom Daviso er even bidonia mwo10 et 190NU

·

foundation in fact and did not emanate from the Capital. I

have it however on the most reliable authority that the

President approved of the idea of my appointment, for which

there were very substantial reasons, but the time for maxi ng

it had not yet arrived. So far therefore, the answer which

was given to Sir J. Jordan's question accords with what had

actually occurred; but none the less the rumour was based

on a sub-stratum of fact. Both Dr Wu Ting Fang and Mr. Tang

Shao Yi, when I saw them in July, thought that the appoint-

ment had in fact been made. But what occurred in the early

part of the year has no bearing on what has subsequently

happened.

.VÄSSJINO?

4.

asi. Jaioq siynia on ni Tel qui a es sa îlesti vige7 9HT

svan vand 8.0

etost IsLJUS 911 no b98ac Ji ai aiseb Ji no ti

,be ja ixe emij smoe 101 gueIsc doina smoa of BISIST Ji dyvore

S

.stab to tuo ei tst oa bre Jesq Jom91 won & of

{

Ji

10 x93j9l yn mi bae ashrot mol 112 et banisiqxe I aA

A BPTOW sa to se 198 vas ni need reven svød I,je Jangua isbnu dojaqeeb siit es juď ;Jasminioqqe ad♬ 101 sjabibas O Ei TajiTa số 88 revo9rom bas asw I Jent 290uess yvIqsı

di of bт8.91 ni "izo ijedtogyn" brow sút sau cú b9289iq .9880 end to ajost end etej8-91 OJ V 182 89090 ei

C

t

3 10 Juo s8018 198İVda Isşsı animo59c ym to noisesup suT

Jabi nousi ni noagnoн ni isod 18л TI2 Njia no itsay9VNOD B ICI net aniT D . TⱭ mort Jesuper a vd pewolfol esw olde

SISW 809AT - Jaoq i E toi ancijsɔiìifsup ya to Jusm9jeje

DMJ IY oaic Enst

reimer¶ nedi edi od min yď bsbISWIO)

sit Juonguoid betelvorio x rais noos VI9V BBW

I

It is a complete mistake to imagine that I have ever,

since I have been in Peking, solicited or "continued to

solicit", as alleged in the despatch under reply, Sir J.

Jordan's official support of my so called candidature. In the first place, from the information I had received I did not think that such support was necessary: and in the second place nothing could have been further from my thoughts

than to solicit it, for I have never desired it since I

came to Peking, and I have invariably informed the chine se Ministers that in my opirion (based on previous experience) the support of any candidate for an Advisership by his Lega-

tion was most undesirable, and might, for obvious reasons, prove most prejudicial to the bests interests of the

Government

. I have therefore told them that I had no of...

ficial relations with, and was entirely independent of,

British Legation.

5.

TUOMUI aft

. 112 was jarit i nedw .batnioqqs reed bad I tent bixow

λ

on bed a TUCHUT 989dJ Jødt bemrotni ed gaixeq ni nabrot

no iJabot

the

It is true that when the subject was first broached in Hongkong, I wrote to Sir J. Jordan and Dr. Morrison on the subject, and received very flattering answers: the former saying that my previous services would almost entitle me to the post should it come to be created, the latter that he

haa

India.

Med

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.